The current City Council members must   L O V E  these distraction candidates.   In a very real sense, these distraction nominees are some of the best friends the incumbants have.  But, a  vote for Kahn is a vote against incumbency.

How is it that BOTH of  these statements can be true ?

See, all you have to do is answer the question "What are Kahn's chances of winning ?" - - - which, in and of itself is politically incorrect.  People will shout all kinds of nasty things as soon as you go down this path. . . . and perhaps, some simply stop thinking right there . . . . this IS America - right ?

But - it's pretty simple - -  

Since Kahn is so unlikely to garner a winning total of votes, and since incumbents know with pretty good precision the electorate they can count on - - - the presence of Kahn along with that of many other well-intentioned nominees simply fragments the anti-incumbency vote across multiple candidate lines.  

THE MORE, THE MERRIER !!!!

http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2010/02/01/repower-control-fremont/

You are right, Big T.

Like you, I was unable to understand much of what Fazlur was saying.

this guy is amazing with his conspiracy theory about the City Council and the Chamber Of Commerce  and Nummi. What a wack job

http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2010/03/31/nummi-redevelopment-idea-369/